I hardly think that's fair. I voted to keep it myself, as did some even more respectable editors. Individuals have their individual reasons, & they are given on the AfD page. That the guy who added the junk has made it less likely that it will be kept is in my view unfortunate. But I do not say he is part of any hypothetical group devoted to indirectly discrediting the article. -- David Goodman
This may not be a real nut. There seems to be a dedicated posse that's hell bent on keeping [[wipipedia]] on Wikipedia at all costs, policy be damned. This may go as far as "creative harassment" of anybody who dares nominate their pet article. Same may be true for the other noms you mentioned. Maybe their hope is that if people fear real life actions from "nut cases", then nobody will dare nominate their pet articles for deletion.