Should we then only write nice things about people/ Should we only include facts that the subjects' approve? Or should we be impartial and show that there is reality and negativeity?
On 5/11/05, slimvirgin@gmail.com slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ed,
Sending this offline, just to say that I very much agree with you regarding the principle of being nice. We seem to be almost alone in this, however, and fighting an uphill battle.
Best,
Sarah
On 5/11/05, Poor, Edmund W Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote:
There is no legal ground related to us mentionning that a third party elected him a kook; so this issue is irrelevant.
If not on legal grounds, how about on the general principle of being nice?
Is it crucial to Wikipedia's integrity that we INCLUDE a mention of the fact that some anonymous troublemakers have branded a non-notable private citizen with a very annoying label?
Uncle Ed thinks not. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l