HOW ARE YOU GENTLEMEN. ALL YOUR ENCYCLOPEDIA ARE BELONG TO US.
More Britannica-bashing (with a splash of Wikilove): http://macuser.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/64348
One interesting point: from the article:
The search feature is functional but unintelligent: it won't correct 'apppendix', for example, or find anything at all if you ask it about the humble, misspelt 'bananana'. It will discretely warn you of your mistake by turning your search term red, but when sites such as Google can take a guess at what your poorly spelt words mean, we don't see why an encyclopaedia shouldn't be able to do the same.
Of course we currently already create "misspellings" redirects (manually), but that's no substitute for a "fuzzy logic" implementation. This may take the form of an extra "Did you mean..."-box on the "WP does not yet have an article"-page. If such is considered useful, someone (<slacker>i.e. someone else ;-)</slacker>) could BugZillify this as a Feature Request.
-- ropers [[en:User:Ropers]] www.ropersonline.com