Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 11:09, Screamer wrote:
Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:19, Oskar Sigvardsson wrote:
This is quite an extremist opinion, with which many people would have huge problems.
I'm aware of that. So what?
I exist. But I'm not a legitimate subject for an article.
Yes, you are.
Are you aware of our policy and guidelines regarding , for example, notability? Additionally, if the community does not want an article included, say via AFD, is it still a legit article? How do you address that?
Simple: our "policies" (which are merely descriptive of past tendencies, and carry no actual normative weight anyway--they're not *REALLY* policies in the normal sense of the word) and the AfD outcomes are wrong.
And the sky is not *really* blue tinted. Forgive my parallel. The policy has weight, and is enforceable. We have IAR, yes, but largely - the policy is enforceable. Until it is changed. Perhaps you could start a talk page discussion with the suggestions, I would go comment on it.
AFD outcomes are always wrong? How do you address this?
./scream