"The barber shaves every many who shaves himself."
The problem here is article and source, of if-you-will source and meta-source.
We can certainly impugn a source using ad-hoc methods. We have no firm guidelines for how we credit or discredit a source. So we can certainly state and try to achieve consensus on the idea that this book is not itself a reliable source. If someone wants a *source* for that, they should realize they are up on the meta level now, not in article space.
Will Johnson
************** Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)