On 5/24/06, Philip Welch wikipedia@philwelch.net wrote:
Usually, one is (a) either supposed to get the hint and stop adding it back in, or (b) attempt to discuss the issue instead if just revert warring over it.
I sort of think we're losing sight of the fact that he had less than 50 edits total. Basically, what it comes down to is, is he willing to accept that he violated our code of behaviour (whether or not he knew about it), and is he willing to totally change his way of editing.
Abu, don't even think about arguing that you did nothing wrong - editing articles in the way you did is totally unacceptable to WIkipedia. Your only defence here is ignorance and pleading remorse, and promising never to do it again.
The Oracle has spoken.
Steve