I think you have missed serious things. Arbcom case seems to have been rigged by trolls. The evidence presented by excellent editors were not even looked at. See. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2/Ev... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2/Ev... What Bakasuprman knows a ton on India comes from certain notorious websites, a few psuedo/fringe scholars etc. The regular pattern of Hindutva trolls has been to remove all criticism of people and subjects dear to Bharatiya Janata Party and its allies (Narendra Modi, or Arun Shorie for example) to tarnish their critics and politicians of other camps (eg. Rahul Gandhi), targeting scholars and writers who have efficiently exposed the extreme rightist views on history and culture and spreading lies against them (Romila Thapar and Arundati Roy for example).
On 6/22/07, Goolzaur munaafiq@gmail.com wrote:
Considering that the "sockpuppet" accounts were never blocked, and that Bakasuprman didn't break 3RR, votestack, or cheat blocks, blnguyen never brought it up again. I worked with Bakasuprman on Ashfaqulla Khan and found that he knows a ton on India. However he seems to be an ultraconservative user, however smart he is. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Arbcom-member%27s-prolix-script-for-foul-play-tf389334... Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l