On 3/3/06, slimvirgin@gmail.com slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/3/06, charles matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
But shifting the issue onto the result, which is microscopic at the margin, is a way of not addressing what is going on. (This was the warm-up example, too.)
Sorry, Charles, your examples are going to have to get hotter than that one. :-) An anon IP making a drive-by deletion isn't going to be affected by the contents of V. We need a concrete example of where V or NOR are causing the deletion of unsourced edits that are otherwise known to be accurate.
Here ya go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet_Gambling_Prohibition_Act&...