LaRouche makes Rush Limbaugh look like a model of sanity and moderation. LaRouche's ideas are so bizarre it isn't even clear where to start. For example, he's tried to claim that [[Squaring the circle]] is somehow doable.(disclaimer I got this second have from a bunch of his followers, not from him directly). It seemed to focus on being one of many examples of what would be a valid solution if one were allowed things other than a straight edge and compass. Bottom line: He's close to a grade A crank.
Quoting Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com:
I don't understand what the big deal is with this guy. If the Rush Limbaugh article can get to GA status, what is so special about this Parisian nut?
On 10/19/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 10/19/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/10/2007, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 10/19/07, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
To attempt to end a many-year-old edit war, I have indefinitely full-protected the article [[Views of Lyndon LaRouche]].
Wow. If that sticks, it looks like the downfall of Wikipedia is closer than I had thought.
There should be a downloadable copy of the full history soon, for forking purposes.
Do you have some sort of inside information on this? Just because a dump starts doesn't mean it'll finish.
Anyway, not *that* close. The "indefinite full-protection as the answer to an edit war" meme has only been introduced, for now.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l