Be fair. If you ask, the arbitrators will usually provide their reasoning, even though it may be bad reasoning. Now and then they provide reasoning without being asked. I don't view this as a major problem as far as ArbCom operations are concerned.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:18:26 +0200 From: wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee
I cannot comment on what I cannot see. People would like to know why arbitration committee decided not to pass a remedy or vice versa.
There can indeed be some private communication but not everything should be discussed behind closed doors. The passed remedies are pointless without the logic behind them.
- White CatOn Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Christiano Moreschi < moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
They do have a private mailing list, you know. From what I've heard it's not exactly under-used.
_________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the next generation of Windows Live http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live