Armed Blowfish wrote:
No. There are plenty of matters on which I disagree with Jayjg. But I do believe he means well, and oversight is basically a Good Thing (TM), quite usefull for protecting privacy. Letting me know exactly what sort of information is being protected would defeat the point of protecting it.
Knowing what _sort_ of information is being oversighted is a far cry from knowing the information itself, I don't see how it defeats the point. If I were to ask why something was oversighted there's a big difference between getting the answer "because it contained personal identifying material" and "it contained the home address of User:Encyclofreak, who lives at 121 Big Tree Road in Seattle, NV".