Fred Bauder wrote:
That is nasty. And can produce a lot of needless work. You have to look at the changes they made and save them if they have not made it too complicated, but definitely they are leading you into a trap. If you revert they have this complaint that you removed useful edits. I guess you have to balance the situation. If they have created reams of work by combining a revert with an edit it is their responsibility not yours to do all the extra work involved. This kind of behavior leads to two versions of the articles.
It's hard for someone not closely following the action to catch this sort of thing.
Fred
You mean a bit like this one? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:2004_U.S._Election_controver...
Ta bu shi da yu