What I said: Encourage people to follow the existing rules and find some way to make proper sourcing of articles easier with new Wikipedia programs and bots where they can help.
Mgm
On 3/31/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
In that sense, sourcing requirements *will* help, and they *will* increase the number of eyeballs on articles, because a sourced statement is faster and easier to check than an unsourced one. A rule alone might not suddenly increase the number of eyeballs, but a rule that's enforced would certainly make the eyeballs more effective.
We already have sourcing requirements.
The stupidest thing about this thread is people proclaiming the need for rules we already have, that aren't being followed. Just what makes you think a new rule will?
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l