On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:37:58 +0000, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Well, now, I thought that editorial consensus pretty rapidly formed for mentioning but not linking. Is my memory at fault here?
Then people kept removing it, citing WP:NPA as applying to article space. That is: encyclopedic content being decided for other than encyclopedic reasons. That is: what Alec was talking about just now, that you responded to, that I then responded to.
So some people got it wrong, briefly. Not that it's in the evidence for the arbitration.
Who *is* (present tense) advocating not *mentioning* banned attackers where it would be material in article space?
Guy (JzG)