Sam Korn wrote:
On 4/7/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
If you start defining things based on what the viewers of the picture think about (are they sexually aroused, or do they just find it humorous?) then you get in the territory of "Thought Crime". If enough people get aroused by the Sears lingerie catalog, should that be classified as pornographic too?
No, things should be defined based on what the creators intended the viewers of the picture to think about. Otherwise you delete pictures of sheep on account of the Welsh.
Well, I guess we'll have to delete all the pictures of sheep uploaded by New Zealanders then.