On 2/13/07, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/14/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, now I know what you mean, you are talking about the duplication in the notices.
Is he? I think he's saying that it makes sense that [[Barrel]] links to [[Barrel (disambiguation)]], that [[Barrel (disambiguation)]] links to [[Barrel (unit)]], but that there's no need to link from [[Barrel (unit)]] back to [[Barrel (disambiguation)]].
I believe that the general pattern is for *those* links to not be added, but I could be wrong.
Keep in mind that not everyone is arriving at these articles through an internal link. If a reader searches for "barrel" on Google and happens to click on the link to [[Barrel (unit)]], there should be an obvious way for him to find the other meanings of the term once he realizes that he's at the wrong article.
Kirill