Re: user contributing information on pedophilia that was deleted upon identification as "DW"
I saw most of this last night, and was somewhat confused by the delete of [[ILGA Purges]], because it struck me as mostly factual and encyclopedic information that should've been kept, with fairly minor and fixable POV problems. I didn't say anything because I'm completely unfamiliar with the situation with DW. But in any case, perhaps that article should be undeleted and NPOV'ed rather than simply removed. Most of the other articles aren't particularly interesting though ([[pederast]] is a dictionary definition, for example).
Perhaps this discussion should continue on the wiki somewhere?
-Mark