This is one thing the arbitration committee could do, likewise banning can be for a day, a week, a month, a year, life.
Fred
From: Magnus Manske magnus.manske@web.de Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:50:11 +0100 To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] MNH, again
I just had this idea (not necessarily related to MNH): As a "warning shot" from one of out countless committees, a "problematic" user could be limited to a fixed number of edits per day. That way, he can
- either waste these edits on stuff that gets reverted anyway,
- or use them more wisely,
- or leave if he doesn't think he can limit himself to "decent" edits
As example, I'd say 10 edits per day, for one week. Just to have some figures.
Circumventing these measures by creating an alternate user name or going anon will result in immediate banning.
Magnus (who thinks a little discipline won't harm the project;-)
Fred Bauder wrote:
The members of the mediation and arbitration committees need to get on the stick. You can keep the pressure on...
Fred
From: "KNOTT, T" TKNOTT@qcl.org.uk Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:49:50 -0000 To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] MNH, again
What do we need to do to get the arbitration process sorted out quickly?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l