Seraphim Blade wrote:
One can use editorial judgment regarding how to present sourced information coherently and logically without original research.
Quite true, I've never felt otherwise.
But why can this only apply to secondary sources (as you appear to imply in some of your other postings on this thread) and not also primary ones? I've done plenty of work on Wikipedia with primary sources that's required editorial judgment and I can't think of any instances where it's been disputed.