On 3/1/06, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that the policy state that information without a source may be removed.
Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too often read as though it were "shall".
We have to assume people can read English. Saying that an unsourced edit MAY be removed is clearly not the same as saying it MUST be or SHOULD be.
Sarah