One slight refinement...
In analogic form about applied POV... Pseudoscience : Soviet spy :: Mainstream scientific community : U.S. intelligence services.
Or, put bluntly, "pseudoscience" is a designation given by the mainstream scientific community (to certain fields of study), "Soviet spy" is a designation given by U.S. intelligence services (to certain individuals).
Now the problem with both is that such designations are often highly disputed -- ID claims it is not a pseudoscience and indeed claims that often evolution is pseudoscientific. In labeling ID a pseudoscience and evolution not one, we're implicitly taking a side in this debate.
Again, I think in some circumstances such leaning is not bad -- I would rather Wikipedia be known for supporting the mainstream scientific position on such small details as categorization than known for supporting the fringe position. We're an encyclopedia, after all, and the scientific community POV is easy to understand and relatively transparent for people to look at and evaluate (not the case in terms of U.S. intelligence services POV, which is very purposely closed and obscured). But that's just one take on it.
FF