Of course, section 4 (Modifications) only applies to modified versions of the Document. We interpret it that its conditions apply to the original Document as well, but such requirements are not actually required by the GFDL.
In other words, "if we continue to publish text even after deleting the edits through which it originated" the text being used is in violation of Wikipedia policies, not necessarily the GFDL.
Most of the time each individual page is considered a distinct Document under the terms of the GFDL, in which case copying text from one page to another without indicating authorship history somehow would be a violation of the GFDL.
However, in other cases the entire Wikipedia database is considered a single Document for the purposes of the GFDL, in which case there's no violation.
The interpretation of the Title Page is naturally pretty flexible.
We would be better off if we added "I agree to be credited as 'a Wikipedia contributor' (or collectively as 'various Wikipedia contributors') where authorship must be credited under the terms of the GFDL" to the submission statement. At least for non-logged-in contributions. Save us a lot of grief.
On 6/6/07, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/07, Angela Anuszewski angela.anuszewski@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm sorta new around here, and I guess I am not really sure I understand exactly what the GFDL says and why this (in some people eyes) is an issue. Is there a good summary of this controversy that a neophyte can understand without slogging through months' worth of talk pages?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GFDL particularly section 4, which requires a document's edit history to be maintained in some form or fashion. Generally this is easy to fulfill because the software does it automatically. But, if we continue to publish text even after deleting the edits through which it originated, then no edit history relevant to this text could possibly be readable by the public. Thus the text is being used in violation of the GFDL, unless the edit history is preserved manually by alternative means. The following could be copied from the history window and be more than adequate:
==From [[Some deleted article]]== Edit history: *11:53, 31 May 2007 User3 (requesting zomg speedy deletion) *11:51, 31 May 2007 User2 m (typo fix using AWB) *20:13, 16 May 2007 User1 (←Created page with '// Actual text of joke. //')
// Actual text of joke. //
==Next stupid joke==
If it makes things easier, the edit histories of bad jokes tend to be pretty short.
―C.W.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l