Mav wrote in part:
Toby wrote:
For my part, seeing that mav hasn't continued any objections on that page is sufficient for me to accept that a consensus was reached even for mammals, among those that work on these articles.
Since when has the lack of objection from me been a sign that everything is OK? :)
Despite the smiley, I should probably clarify. You're relevant because you seemed to be the only opposition among the people that were working on the articles in question. (The capitalisers' argument that they're the people writing the material is, in my mind, their most persuasive.) If I've missed anybody, then someone will have to point it out (although since I remain neutral on the issue anyway, in the end it's not really necessary that *I* be informed).
I've been on holiday in Yellowstone and many points in-between Yellowstone and Northern California (I took over 300 digital photos!).
For Wikipedia? Hurrah!
-- Toby