On 2/26/06, Daniel P. B. Smith wikipedia2006@dpbsmith.com wrote:
From: "Steve Bennett" stevage@gmail.com
On 2/24/06, John Lee johnleemk@gawab.com wrote:
Without sources it is [[wikipedia:original research]] and inadmissible.
That's an extreme interpretation of that rule. We should shy aware from removing information simply because it is unsourced. We should only remove it if it is unsourced *and* we find it suspect.
Steve
In short, you do not agree with the verifiability policy, http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:V
I disagree with it strongly. The policy as stated goes way against the stronger policy of Assume Good Faith.