On Nov 30, 2007 5:52 PM, Alec Conroy alecmconroy@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/30/07, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
If that email had been the only way to exonerate !! and !! had still been blocked at the time, and there hadn't already been an arbitration case about the incident started, then there'd be some credibility to that viewpoint.
Unblocked is not exonerated. Showing that the whole process was a farce is exonerated. If nobody leaked the "secret evidence", everyone would assume that there was probably SOMETHING to the evidence, just not enough evidence to convict, as it were.
Which, of course, there was. !! was indeed a returning, experienced editor using a new account.