On 10/5/08, quiddity blanketfort@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages)#More_than_one_author
Uggh, what a mind-numbing thread.
I'll never understand how so many people can take so many GUIDELINES so seriously.
If it's unlikely to become an actual article, then that entry should be removed altogether,
I don't follow this logic.
just like we would if someone added a listing of all the songs titled "confusion" to the Confusion (disambiguation)
Or this. If there is a disproportionate number of songs, it would be most appropriate to make [[Confusion (song)]] a disambig page and list them all there.
We have to be discriminating to help the reader.
This is semantically too close to "prejudiced". You're making it sound implausible for a reader to be seeking info about a topic which does not correspond 1-to-1 with an existing article, but nothing could be further from the truth.
—C.W.