Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:07:42 -0500, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
It seems to me that the type of people with whom this is an increasing problem are not the type of people who are even going to read such a long and complictated guideline, let alone care about following it.
Sure. But it's good to have a well-reasoned guideline to point them to, and when they ignore it then we can justly point to a consensus view which they are going against.
But is it really a consensus view when only a small number of Wikipedians are actively involved, and the rest of us ignore the page completely?
Ec