2009/4/23 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com
2009/4/23 WJhonson@aol.com:
In this case, there are two pages (yes just two) of "biography" if you will, and *six* pages of this nonsense. That's just a tad overweight I
think
we can all agree on that point.
The solution is to add more bio, not to cut the land holdings.
More bio would obviously be fine, but I don't agree that that there is a problem to be solved here.
If it bothers you there is too much "of this nonsense", don't read it. That "nonsense" to you may be much more important to someone else.
"Undue weight" is not an issue either. The article is not asserting that the "nonsense" is more important than anything else in the man's life. It is what it is: a reference list.
Michel