On 3/31/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
The two year version is more likely to know why we are where we are now. Admins who don't know this tend to cause interesting problems. This can also be the case with returning admins. There are other differences that are also likely to exist.
Could a one month editor not be a good admin? If they could, then why do we have such prejudice against the idea?
That sounds like a great recipy for admins to vote against adminship requests of people they have had dissputes with
Sounds good, it would cut both ways, and they could be desysopped at the same time :) Well, seriously, if admins are having serious disputes with each other that they can't resolve, then are they better admins than fresh admins without a long trail of grudges? (just food for thought...)
2 weeks tells you nothing. Even I can avoid causeing problems for a couple of weeks with a bit of effort.
Cool. 2 weeks of problem-free adminning. What's the downside? :)
Steve