Any comments?
1) Use the Good Article Review page. Seriously. If you want to see long-term traction on what you want to do, you're best off demonstrating it rather than having someone accuse you of being disruptive.
2) I was the one who brought up the problem with [[Captain Falcon]] at FAC. That sort of thing, lately, has been the exception, not the rule - generally speaking, articles that lack references the way that one did don't get passed.
3) Keep in mind, if you decide to sweep through, that the GA criteria has tightened considerably. Articles without references are routinely delisted from the candidacy page almost immediately. Considering that we're still finding unsourced FAs from a few years ago, I think it's in good shape for a relatively new process.
Just don't be rash. I doubt the GA regulars want poor articles listed any more than you do.
-Jeff