On 03/02/2008, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
On 03/02/08 15:09 +0000, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 03/02/2008, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 8:28 AM, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
No one's going to challenge an article that cites a lot of sources, not even if it's a stub.
That statement is demonstrably false.
Replace "sources" with "reliable, non-trivial, independent sources", and it's pretty much true.
Not necessarily. It depends upon whether those reliable, non-trivial, independent sources have established relevance to the subject...
I would say that falls under "non-trivial".