Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote: Wikipedia offers no defense, and no protection.
That's the point.
In a sense, it's best for the Foundation, when individual editors are legally attacked and threatened, in contrast to the Foundation itself. The Foundation and the uninterrupted operation of Wikipedia benefits from the view, that the individual contributors *only*, are responsible for the content and the Foundation provides only the infrastructure.
So, the project as a whole benefits from the "we will never surrender"-mentality, individual editors leaving the project, resigning from adminship, losing their job or jumping off the bridge being the roadkill.
Regards, Peter Jacobi, [[User:Pjacobi]]