The Cunctator schreef:
On 6/12/07, Eugene van der Pijll eugene@vanderpijll.nl wrote:
The Cunctator schreef:
That's a prima facie misinterpretation of the GFDL. The "section" it is referring to is obviously a Secondary Section:
Why do you think so? It's not obvious to me.
Because it tells you how to create the section entitled History if a Document does not have one, and it is talking about the history of the Document's authorship.
Also because it would be absurd to author history in a chapter about the history of London.
On that last point, we agree.
I do hope this has been removed in the next version of the GFDL.
Eugene