Isn't it time we decided just what is and isn't acceptable on userpages? Hardly a day goes by without some userpage MfD. While common sense would be able to sort this out no problem, that's something people don't seem to posess:
Firstly, there's the issue of inflamatory userboxes. It appears that userboxes supporting American troops in Iraq are acceptable, but userboxes supporting the Iraqi insurgensy aren't. Userboxes supporting the killing of Iraqi insurgents are acceptable, but ones that support the killing of American troops aren't. Surely both the "support" ones should be acceptable, whilst the ones that support killing should be delete. Then there's the ones that advocate peodophilia. Users who have these often argue that we accept homosexual userboxes, which is just a stupid argument, but they don't seem to be able accept that.
Then there's the issue of mimicing mediawiki interface. Surely telling someone they have new messages when they don't is blatant lying? There was a recent ANI post and MfD over this, and now there's an RfC.
---- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MFD/User:MQDuck.2Fuserboxes.2FRight_T... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:MQDuck/u... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inciden... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Certified.Gangsta#New_messages http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_notice... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Certifie... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/Iraq http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Policies/Userbox...