On 4/20/06, maru dubshinki marudubshinki@gmail.com wrote:
We shouldn't examine that data, however. Very bad precedent, and poor for privacy, especially since we aren't dealing with out-and-out vandals here, but merely critics.
If the circumstantial evidence provided is valid, this is far worse than vandalism. This is people in a position of trust abusing it and possibly exposing Wikipedia to liability for copyright infringement or defamation by causing such material to be published.