Steve Bennett wrote:
On 8/24/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
block. Unfortunately we don't have a good way of closely monitoring the contribs of a warned user, but thats another matter.
It would be fascinating to construct a sort of dynamic trust metric where people have trust ratings that cause all kinds of interesting things to happen. Anons could be given 3 out of 10, and slowly start heading upwards if they register and keep their noses clean. Vandalism-detection bots could take into account the trust metric to work out if a change is likely a mistake or deliberate.
Lots of fun, but probably terrible for social harmony.
It would entirely depend who you made the data available to. If it was only available to a small group of people...