Philip Sandifer wrote:
I think the response is better summarized as "it is impossible to reduce the error rate to 0 with a population of this size."
I agree. I still think the error rate is far too high, and that we can improve upon it if we think together about what some of the common causes are and how they might be fixed.
In an effort to separate this issue from what I take to have been the discussion you were trying to start, I'll make a separate reply with some thoughts on the issues you're trying to raise. But I urge you to avoid the sort of parenting "let's all reflect on this" approach.
I don't think it is "parenting" at all to say "let's all reflect on this".
--Jimbo