On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:36:08 -0500, Gwern Branwen gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
Just for those who weren't around for the Brandt articles: what Guy is saying here is arrant nonsense. The Brandt article had dozens of good sources stretching back decades. It was deleted out of a combination of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:NEVILLECHAMBERLAIN.
So you say. I think it went because the sources were not *about Brandt*.
But I'm game, let's take it to deletion review.
Guy (JzG)