Fred Bauder said:
Because you are intelligent, knowledgable and understand how public relations works and have the best interests of Wikipedia at heart? And have common sense?
I've said already that I think this is something only the Board can decide. Either we stay the way we are--and no amount of filtering and whatnot will disguise the fact that the operation of our existing content policy fails to censor content in a manner which would make the whole of Wikipedia acceptable to the general public--or the Board imposes content restrictions. I don't mind which is chosen--as David has suggested, any radical change in policy would risk a fork--but playing games with image filtering is like rearranging the deck-chairs on the Titanic. Trying to appease the likes of Bill O'Reilly (assuming he would oppose rather than welcome Wikipedia's openness--which is a big assumption) is pointless. Only the Board can make decisions of this kind. The membership can't even raise a consensus to link the autofellatio guy or to delete an article describing a potentially lethal form of sexual assault as a "sex move."