On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
Joe Szilagyi wrote:
Why not just list them at BADSITES as a "do not link list"?
That kinda defeats the purpose.
Yeah, but that was my point. :) As it is now, anything from MSNBC.com to CNN.com to Wikipedia Review to Making Light to ED to whitehouse.gov could theoretically be an attack site. I don't think it's appropriate for any one person to make the decision. Anyone can put forth a site as one, but if people don't support it...
Regards, Joe http://www.joeszilagyi.com