-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Fastfission stated for the record:
If I were somebody with access to U.S. military secrets and I posted them to Wikipedia, I would certainly be *personally* legally accountable for having them up. Because Wikipedia is in the U.S., it too would probably be legally accountable as well under U.S. classification laws. But what if they were, say, Iranian military secrets? The contributor, if they were Iranian, would probably be personally accountable still. But since it is unlikely that Iranian classification laws apply to entities in the U.S., there would be no legal issue for Wikipedia to have them up (unless they in some way fell under U.S. law, which a few categories of information still would).
(The WP:V question is different entirely, of course.)
Except that the WP:V question is the crux of the matter! Those Iranian military secrets would either be entirely unverifiable, and thus un-Wiki-able, or they would be verifiable, and so not secret.
I just went through this loop a few times personally -- I posted details about the [[S8G reactor]] plant back in the days before WP:V was enforced. Recently, a newbie popped up and accused me of endangering the lives of his shipmates and threatening to have me arrested. Hilarity ensued, until I added the sources I had omitted earlier. Obviously a secret widely available on the Web (including, as I recall, a Russian Web site) is not much of a secret.
- -- Sean Barrett | We completely deny the allegations, and sean@epoptic.org | we're trying to identify the alligators.