I think that a number of users have been misunderstanding my posting. I was not calling Ed Poor's activities on the mailing list an abuse of admin powers. This was just an attempt by Ed Poor to poison the well against me so that he could get his way on the Pinochet article, where he did abuse admin powers.
His unprotection of the Pinochet article and minutes later his restoration of the version favored by VeryVerily (but opposed by roughly 90% of the users who've participated in the discussion on the talk page) were the abuses to which I was referring.
-172
_________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963