On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
What is not acceptable is a determined effort, in the face of warnings, to repeatedly link to an attack site. Whatever the excuse given.
Yes, exactly that. Determined effort in the face of warnings (or even polite requests) is the behaviour problem. Simply linking in the first place is not in and of itself a behaviour problem
Determined effort to link in the face of warnings is only a behavior problem once it has been established that making the link is inappropriate and the warnings are necessary. But for the attack sites policy, this is the *very thing in dispute*.
In other words, linking in the face of warnings about policies may be trouble. Linking in the face of warnings about non-policies isn't.