Stephen Bain wrote:
On 2/12/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
So what if he's the most inclusionist inclusionist on the project? If we allow republicans to be sysops we should allow inclusionists :-)
The "community" only wants admins who will delete whatever they decide to put into [[CAT:CSD]].
Others who should have been promoted but were not for ridiculous reasons include Stephen B Streater and Georgewilliamherbert.
This sounded like a good idea to me before, but I wouldn't be surprised if I'm hounded down as a cabalist: how about if any X number of admins think someone should have the mop, then that person gets the mop on a trial basis for Y amount of time, perhaps with a regular RFA at the end of the trial period. Adjust X and Y to taste.
I have no problem with bureaucrats who use common sense to override a negative RfA result.
Ec