On 6/3/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
On Jun 3, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Sam Spade wrote:
process of competant peer review
Do you have a link to that?
Fred
If your asking where I asked for one, you'd have to scroll up in this thread. If your asking for a link about one, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
If your trying to understand what I'm talking about, I'm asking for a competent process of peer review to resolve the myriad disputes that brought me before you. That way we could have quality, peer reviewed articles instead of personality driven conflicts.
If you haven't noticed, I care about article quality, and am in no way "rogue". The idea that I should be put on "probation" due to having had annoyed a popular wiki-personality, rather than that the article disputes in question could use a thorough review astounds me.
Bottom line, is the wikipedia a web-community or an encyclopedia?
If it is an encyclopedia, can we please stop with all these games, and find a way to resolve content disputes?
If it is a web-community, I have no interest in it, and intend to leave.
Your no judge, I'm no criminal, and the only thing on "probation" around here is the wikipedia, which I will abstain from editing until this is resolved to my satisfaction. Either way I sternly recommend you find a better way to encourage your contributors.
SS