On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
My idea of a comprehensive review includes at least some examination of the edits of an editor prior to the implementation of a ban. Not everyone agrees. Sometimes efficient review is stifled by a low signal to noise ratio (cliched as that phrase has become these days). I think that has happened in this case, but hopefully the Committee if it chooses to accept the case can cut through the noise and make a determination.
Nathan
That would be a first. More likely silence for a fortnight followed by a reminder to follow our core policies and a general amnesty.
RR