Actually, I always assumed that the number of articles template included absolutely every article, including vandalism CSD articles and stubs.
On 9/15/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/15/06, ikiroid ikiroid@gmail.com wrote:
It's so hard to write FAs though....and 100,000 means about 10% of all existing articles. Many existing articles are redirects, disambigs, lists, etc. and others don't have enough info on the topic to be featured. I don't like being someone's fantasy nazi, but it seems extremely difficult, if not impossible. It would be more logical to aim for 10,000, or even 5,000 FAs. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I totally agree it's hard, but I'm sure the article count excluded stubs and redirects. Anyway, there's nothing wrong with aiming high, but aiming just a little lower may get more pessimistic people into gear.
Mgm _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l