On 9/10/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/09/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and thanks to people claiming the "DRV doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted" (despite the fact that several people were strongly in favour), I've now created the proposed policy of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_Undeletion for your perusal.
Well, it arguably didn't, regrettable as that is.
Possible workable split: DRV for strict process review; AFU for merit undeletion.
Perhaps keep DRV as a general over-arching policy and add "Process Review
of Deletion" (or something similar) for process appeals and Articles for Undeletion for content appeals. Basically, disambiguate the usage and intent.
Carl