James Farrar wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Kat Walsh mindspillage@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/24/07, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
I am very familiar with your argument, but reject it. We can give equal priority to both. Things we do should support a "free encyclopedia". Both. If there is something we are thinking about doing that fails either of those, for example becoming a free travel website or becoming a non-free encyclopedia we should reject it. A red ball is both a ball, and red. There is no choosing.
Thank you.
Free over encyclopaedia, then.
How about encyclopedia over free, but with the less-free stuff marked in such a way that it's easy for a downstream user to choose to strip the less-free stuff out in an automated manner? That way you _can_ have both cake and the eating thereof.