Yes, it would be most use to articles that don't get much attention, but then, I am guessing that ones that do get more action get checked more. It's the ones that noone ever sees that concern me most. The edit history would show whether there were major changes since a check. Can anyone who is more conversant with how the categories (or another system) work suggest a way to trial this that wouldn't annoy people?
--- Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Mark Richards wrote
I agree - is there any way that we could use
markers
or categories (maybe on the talk page) to
'certify'
that articles have been checked by someone for g
and
s?
There seems to be plenty of flexibility in the category system for 'rating usages'. The page history would show up edits subsequent to any 'rating'. Of course this is most useful on pages that are rarely edited. Which will in many cases be those that are _least_ read. I don't know how practical it would be to institute a drive to spread this all over WP. The basic categories are not propagating so very rapidly, IMX.
Charles
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo